Press & Legal Resource · Updated Regularly

Colorado Supreme Court Injury & Insurance Case Tracker

A running reference of Colorado Supreme Court cases affecting injured Coloradans and the insurance claims process — maintained by Malnar Injury Law (Stubborn Attorney) for reporters, fellow attorneys, and injured policyholders who want to understand how the state's highest court is shaping personal injury and insurance law.

Other Colorado Supreme Court Cases to Watch

Additional Colorado Supreme Court cases touching injury and insurance law, tracked here as they develop. This section is updated as new cases are accepted or decided.

Pending

Esurance Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Bohanan

Certiorari granted August 2026 · Colorado Supreme Court

The Court will decide whether an insurer violated Colorado's policy-disclosure law by waiting nearly a year to disclose an at-fault driver's insurance policy, even though the policy ultimately turned out not to have been in effect at the time of the crash. Colorado law requires insurers to disclose potentially relevant policies within 30 days of a request, with a $100-per-day penalty for delay. A Denver district court and a divided Court of Appeals panel both sided with the injured claimant; the insurer has appealed.

Why it matters: A ruling for the claimant would reinforce that insurers can't sit on potentially relevant policy information without facing daily penalties — a significant tool for injured drivers trying to identify all available coverage after a crash.
Decided

Pinto v. United Services Automobile Association (USAA)

Decided June 8, 2026 · Colorado Supreme Court No. 26SA29

The Court held that its 2018 decision in Schultz v. GEICO Casualty Company — which limits an insurer to the information it had when it denied a bad-faith claim — does not extend to ordinary breach-of-contract claims for benefits owed under a policy. As a result, an insurer defending a benefits claim (as opposed to a bad-faith claim) may seek updated medical records and request an independent medical exam, even after the claim was denied.

Why it matters: Injured policyholders pursuing UM/UIM benefits claims should expect that filing suit can open the door to further medical discovery on the contract claim, even though the same limits still apply to a separate bad-faith claim.
Decided

Skillett v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company

Colorado Supreme Court

The Court ruled that an individual insurance claims adjuster is not personally liable for a claim denial made solely in the adjuster's capacity as an employee handling the policyholder's underinsured motorist claim, since the adjuster was not a party to the insurance contract itself.

Why it matters: Injured policyholders pursuing bad-faith or wrongful-denial claims should generally look to the insurance company itself, not the individual adjuster, as the proper defendant.

For Journalists & Media

Malnar Injury Law is available for comment on Colorado Supreme Court cases involving injury claims, insurance bad faith, and UM/UIM coverage disputes — including, but not limited to, our own pending case, Berns v. State Farm. If you're covering a Colorado Supreme Court decision or certified question in this space, we're glad to provide context or a quote on deadline.

Media ContactRyan Malnar, Founder
FirmMalnar Injury Law (Stubborn Attorney)
LocationColorado Springs, CO

Dealing With a Denied or Delayed Insurance Claim in Colorado?

If your own insurance company is disputing, delaying, or denying a claim after a crash, Malnar Injury Law can review what happened — including whether the handling of your claim raises the same kinds of issues now before the Colorado Supreme Court. Consultations are free, and we don't get paid unless we win.

Call (719) 888-9529

6799 Bismark Rd Ste. C, Colorado Springs, CO 80922 · Available 24/7

Attorney Advertising / Disclaimer: This page is provided for general informational and press-reference purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship. Case summaries are simplified for general audiences; for full case details, consult the official court opinions or docket. Berns v. State Farm remains pending before the Colorado Supreme Court, State Farm disputes the underlying claims, and no determination of liability has been made. Descriptions of other courts' decisions reflect published opinions and reporting as of the date noted and may be superseded by later rulings, rehearing, or appeal. Malnar Injury Law does not represent any party in the other cases described on this page. Prior results, including verdicts and awards referenced by this firm, do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future matter. This communication complies with Colorado RPC 7.1.